Hector-Institut für Empirische Bildungsforschung

Dr. Steffen Gottschling

Steffen Gottschling war bis zum 30.04.22 wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Hector-Institut für Empirische Bildungsforschung. In seiner Forschung beschäftigt er sich mit Scientific Literacy und der strategischen Nutzung von Quelleninformation bei der Beurteilung wissenschaftlicher Konflikte durch Laien.

Publikationen

  • Gottschling, S. (2021). Down to the source! – Laypersons’ processing and use of differences in relevant source information when confronted with conflicting scientific claims (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen).
  • Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2021). Readers’ regulation and resolution of a scientific conflict based on differences in source information: an eye-tracking study. Discourse Processes, 58(5-6), 468-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1930808
  • Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., Richter, S., & Gerjets, P. (2021, July). Can Users Distinguish Narrative Texts Written by an Artificial Intelligence Writing Tool from Purely Human Text?. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 520-527). Springer, Cham.
  • Kammerer, Y., Gottschling, S., & Bråten, I. (2021). The Role of Internet-Specific Justification Beliefs in Source Evaluation and Corroboration During Web Search on an Unsettled Socio-Scientific Issue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 342-378. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952731
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2020). How laypersons consider differences in sources’ trustworthiness and expertise in their regulation and resolution of scientific conflicts. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(4), 335-354. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1849856
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2019). Readers’ Processing and Use of Source Information as a Function of Its Usefulness to Explain Conflicting Scientific Claims. Discourse Processes, 56(5-6), 429-446. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1610305

Konferenzbeiträge

  • Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2020, July). Eyes on the Source! – The Role of Differences in Source Trustworthiness on Lay Persons’ Attention to Source Information during the Resolution of Scientific Conflicts. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D) (online conference). [Talk]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2020, October). Differences in experts and laypersons’ sourcing when reading about a scientific conflict in nanosafety an eye tracking study. Nanosafety 2020 (online conference). [Poster]
  • Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, July). Reducing reliance on misinformation through psychoeducation in combination with an error-marking task. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). New York, USA. [Talk]
  • Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, August). Reducing reliance on misinformation through psychoeducation and an error marking task. 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Aachen, Germany. [Talk]
  • Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, September). Reduktion des Fehlinformationseffekts durch eine kombinierte Intervention aus Psychoedukation und dem Anstreichen von Fehlern. Tagung der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie (PAEPSY). Leipzig, Deutschland. [Vortrag]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2018, July). Readers’ Attention to and Use of Source Information as a Function of its Usefulness to Explain Conflicting Scientific Claims. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). Brighton, UK. [Talk]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2018, November). Readers’ processing and use of source information as a function of its usefulness to explain conflicting scientific claims. Workshop on Multiple Documents Literacy. Bochum. [Talk]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2018, August). ‘Down to the source!’ ‒ Lay peoples’ use of source information in the evaluation of conflicting scientific claims. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Special Interest Group (SIG 2): Comprehension of Text and Graphics. Freiburg. [Poster]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2018, June). How Source Information Influences Lay People's Interpretation of a Scientific Conflict. International Summer School “Trust in mediated communication”. Münster. [Poster]
  • Gerjets, P., & Gottschling, S. (2017, März). Kontroverse Wissenschaft: Wie beurteilen Laien Informationen im Internet? Workshop Nanosicherheit 2.0 (Leibniz-Forschungsverbund Nanosicherheit), INM – Leibniz Institut für Neue Materialen. Saarbrücken. [Vortrag]
  • Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2017, September). Der Einfluss von Quelleninformationen und persönlichen Einstellungen auf die Interpretation eines wissenschaftlichen Konflikts. Gemeinsame Tagung der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie (PAEPSY). Münster. [Poster]

Curriculum Vitae

seit 04/2021
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter

Hector-Institut für Empirische Bildungsforschung, Universität Tübingen

03/2021
Promotion in Psychologie (Dr. rer. nat.)

Universität Tübingen

10/2020-03/2021
Privatdozent

International School of Management, Stuttgart

04/2017-09/2018
Privatdozent

Universität Tübingen

seit 11/2016
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien

10/2015-10/2016
Masterstudiengang Psychologie

Universität Tübingen

03/2014-09/2016
Studentische Hilfskraft

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien

10/2011-9/2015
Bachelorstudiengang Psychologie

Universität Tübingen