##* SIGGRAPH Submission Review Template
##* VERSION 1.0
##!
##! Title:

##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Description:
##! Briefly describe the paper and its contribution to computer
##! graphics and interactive techniques. Please give your assessment of
##! the scope and magnitude of the paper's contribution.
##! 
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_2


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Clarity of Exposition:
##! Is the exposition clear? How could it be improved?
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_3


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Quality of References:
##! Are the references adequate? List any additional references that
##! are needed.
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_4


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Reproducibility:
##! Could the work be reproduced from the information in the paper? Are
##! all important algorithmic or system details discussed adequately?
##! Are the limitations and drawbacks of the work clear?
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_5


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Rating:
##! Please rate this paper on a continuous scale from 1 to 5, where:
##! 1 = Definitely reject. I would protest strongly if it's accepted.
##! 2 = Probably reject. I would argue against this paper.
##! 3 = Possibly accept, but only if others champion it.
##! 4 = Probably accept. I would argue for this paper.
##! 5 = Definitely accept. I would protest strongly if it's not
##! accepted.
##! Please base your rating on the paper as it was submitted.
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_52


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Reviewer Expertise:
##! Please rate your expertise in the subject area of the paper on a
##! continuous scale from 1 to 3, where:
##! 1=Beginner 2=Knowledgeable, 3=Expert.
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_53


##* END_ANSWER


##! -------------------------------------------------------------------
##! Explanation of Rating:
##! Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of
##! the submission, contributions, and the potential impact of the
##! paper.  Include suggestions for improvement and publication
##! alternatives, if appropriate. Be thorough. Be fair. Be courteous.
##! Your evaluation will be forwarded to the authors during the
##! rebuttal period.
##* BEGIN_ANSWER_6


##* END_ANSWER
##* END_REVIEW

##! ===================================================================