High-performing predictive models, such as neural nets, usually operate as black boxes, which raises serious concerns about their interpretability. 
Local feature attribution methods help to explain black box models and are therefore a powerful tool for assessing the reliability and fairness of predictions. 
To this end, most attribution models compare the importance of input features with a reference value, often called baseline. 
Recent studies show that the baseline can heavily impact the quality of feature attributions. Yet, we frequently find simplistic baselines, such as the zero vector, in practice. 
In this paper, we show empirically that baselines can significantly alter the discriminative power of feature attributions. 
We conduct our analysis on tabular data sets, thus complementing recent works on image data. Besides, we propose a new taxonomy of baseline methods. 
Our experimental study illustrates the sensitivity of popular attribution models to the baseline, thus laying the foundation for a more in-depth discussion on sensible baseline methods for tabular data.