Uni-Tübingen

Publikationen

Eingereicht/angenommen

  • Konietzko, A. (eingereicht) PP extraction from subject islands in German. Ms., University of Tübingen.
  • Konietzko, A. & A. Seitz. (eingereicht) Ambiguity resolution in coordinate structures. Ms., University of Tübingen.
  • Remmele, B., S. Schopper, R. Hörnig, & S. Winkler (im Erscheinen) (Non)Strategic Production Planning and Ambiguity: Experimental Evidence. In: M. Bauer & A. Zirker (eds.), Strategies of Ambiguity. Routledge.
  • Culicover, P. & S. Winkler (eingereicht) Parasitic gaps aren't parasitic: The case of the uninvited guest. The Linguistic Review.
  • Varaschin, G., Culicover, P. & S. Winkler (angenommen) In Pursuit of Condition C. In: A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.) Information Structure and Discourse in Generative Grammar: Mechanisms and Processes. De Gruyter.
  • Fortmann, Ch., A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eingereicht) Fragmentary subordinate clauses. Studia Linguistica.
  • Molnár, V. & S. Winkler (eingereicht) The Architecture of Topic and Focus – Information structure in the Germanic Languages. In: D. Jonas (ed.) The Blackwell Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Blackwell.
  • Cortés Rodríguez, Á. (eingereicht) Which linguist which structure: An experimental investigation of multiple sluicing in English. In A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (Eds.), Information Structure and Discourse in Generative Grammar. Mechanisms and Processes. SGG 146. Boston & Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

2020

  • Jäger, M. (2020). Focus particles and extraction: An experimental investigation of German and English focus particles with leftward association. Tübingen: Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen/TOBIAS-lib.

2019

  • Remmele, B. (2019). The Prosody of Sluicing: Production Studies on Prosodic Disambiguation. Tübingen: Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen/TOBIAS-lib.
  • Featherston, S., R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.) (2019). Experiments in Focus. Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Linguistische Arbeiten. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Hörnig, R., S. Featherston, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (2019). Markedness in Context: An Approach to Licensing. In S. Featherston, R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.), Experiments in Focus. Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1-16.
  • Hartmann, J. M. (2019). Focus and Prosody in Nominal Copula Clauses. In S. Featherston, R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.), Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Berlin: De Gruyter. 71-104.
  • Konietzko, A., J. Radó & S. Winkler (2019). Focus Constraints on Relative Clause Antecedents in Sluicing. In S. Featherston, R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.), Experiments in Focus. Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Berlin: De Gruyter. 105-128.
  • Konietzko, A. & K. Lidzba (2019). The Processing of Argument Structure: A Comparison between Patients with Early Left-hemispheric Brain Lesions and Healthy Controls. In S. Featherston, R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.), Experiments in Focus. Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Berlin: De Gruyter. 279-304.
  • Culicover, P. & S. Winkler (2019). Why topicalize VP? In V. Molnár, V. Egerland & S. Winkler (eds.), Architecture of Topic and Topicalization. Studies in generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. 173-202.
  • De Kuthy, K. & A. Konietzko (2019). Information Structural Constraints on PP Topicalization from NPs. In V. Molnár, V. Egerland & S. Winkler (eds.), Architecture of Topic. Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. 203-222.
  • Molnár, V., V. Egerland & S. Winkler (2019). Exploring the Architecture of Topic at the Interface of Grammar and Discourse. In V. Molnár, V. Egerland & S. Winkler (eds.), Architecture of Topic and Topicalization. Studies in generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1-44.
  • Winkler, S. (2019). Chapter 15: Ellipsis and Prosody. In J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 357-386.

2018

  • Hartmann, J. M. (2018). A focus analysis of apparent predicational clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32, 121-143.
  • Radó J., A. Konietzko and W. Sternefeld (2018). Telescoping in Relative Clauses: Experimental Evidence. In M. Krifka and M. Schenner (eds.), Reconstruction Effects in Relative Clauses. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 405-426
  • Culicover, P. & S. Winkler (2018). Freezing: Between Grammar and Processing. In J. M. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 353-386.
  • Hartmann, J.M., M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.) (2018), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Hartmann, J.M., M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (2018), Exploring the concepts of Freezing: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 1–25.
  • Hartmann, J.M. (2018). Freezing in it-clefts: the role of the focus phrase. In J. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter. 195-224.
  • Jäger, M. (2018). An Experimental Study on Freezing and Topicalization in English. In J. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter. 430-450.
  • Konietzko, A. (2018). Heavy NP Shift in Context: On the Interaction of Information Structure and Extraction from Shifted Constituents. In J. M. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter. 387-402.
  • Konietzko, A., S. Winkler & P. Culicover (2018). Heavy NP Shift does not cause Freezing. Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 63(2), 454-464.

2017

  • Hartmann, J. M. & C. Heycock (2017). Variation in copular agreement in Insular Scandinavian. In H. Thráinsson, C. Heycock, Z. Svabo Hansen & H. Petersen (eds.), Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian. Studies in German Linguistics. John Benjamins.
  • Hohaus, V. and A. Konietzko (2017). (Pseudo-)Extraction from VP-proforms: The Case of the Comparative Clause. In Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal (ed.) Proceedings of IATL 31. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 82, 53-65.

2016

  • Hartmann, J., Konietzko, A., Salzmann, M. (2016). On the limits of non-parallelism in ATB movement. In S. Featherston & Y. Versley (eds.), Firm Foundations: Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 51-83.
  • Hartmann, J. M. & C. Heycock (2016). Evading agreement: A new perspective on low nominative agreement in Icelandic. In C. Hammerly & B. Prickett (eds.), NELS 46: Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (Volume 2). Amherst, GLSA. 67-80.
  • Kehl, A. (2016). The Restriction on Predicative Codas in Existential There-Clauses: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. University of Tübingen: M.A. thesis. dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-13504
  • Konietzko, A. (2016). Bare Argument Ellipsis and Focus: Theory and Experimentation. Linguistik Aktuell/ Linguistics Today 233. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Schopper, S. (2016). A Classification of Right Node Raising: Are some instances of Right Node Raising Parentheticals? University of Tübingen: M.A. thesis. dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-12226
  • Winkler, S., Radó, J., Gutscher, M. (2016). What determines 'freezing' effects in was-für split constructions? In S. Featherston & Y. Versley (eds.), Firm Foundations: Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 207-231.
  • Winkler, S. (2016). Current Issues of Information Structure Chapter 18: Ellipsis and Information Structure. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (eds.), The (Oxford) Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 359-382.

2015

  • Hofmeister, P., Culicover, P. & Winkler, S. (2015). Effects of processing on the acceptability of 'frozen' extraposed constituents. Syntax 18:4, 464-483.
  • Schmeh, K., Culicover, P., Hartmann, J., Winkler, S. (2015). Discourse Function Ambuigity of Fragments: A Linguistic Puzzle / Diskursfunktionenambiguitäten von Fragmenten: Ein linguistisches Rätsel. In S. Winkler (ed.), Ambiguität: Sprache und Kommunikation / Ambiguity: Language and Communication. Berlin, New York: Mounton de Gruyter, 201-218.
  • Wiedmann, N. & S. Winkler (2015). The Influence of Prosody on Children's Processing of Ambiguous Sentences/ Die Rolle der Prosodie für die Verarbeitung von ambigen Sätzen bei Kindern. In S. Winkler (ed.), Amibguität: Sprache und Kommunikation/ Ambiguity: Language and Communication. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter, 185-200.
  • Winkler, S. (ed.) (2015). Ambiguität: Sprache und Kommunikation / Ambiguity: Language and Communication. Berlin, New York: Mounton de Gruyter.

2013

  • Hartmann, J.M., J. Radó & S. Winkler (eds.) (2013). Information Structure Triggers: Effects in (De)Accentuation, Dislocation and Discourse Linking. Special Issue: Lingua 136.
  • Hartmann, J.M. & S. Winkler (2013). Investigating the role of information structure triggers. Introduction. Lingua 136 [Special Issue on Information Structure Triggers], 1-15.
  • Hartmann, J. M. (2013). Freezing in it-clefts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58(3), 487-496.
  • Hartmann, J. M. (2013). Apparent exceptions to the Definiteness Effect in English. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XV, no. 2, 5-25.
  • Hartmann, J. M., V. Hegedűs & B. Surányi (2013). Pseudoclefts in Hungarian and German. In J. Brandtler, V. Molnár & C. Platzack (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 13: Papers from the 2011 Lund conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67-97.
  • Winkler, S. (2013). Syntactic Diagnostics for Extraction of Focus from Ellipsis Site. In: Cheng, L. and N. Corver (eds.), Diagnosing Syntax. Oxford University Press, 463-484.

2012

  • Gutscher, M., S. Holler, J. Radó & S. Winkler (2012). What determines freezing effects in was-für split construction? Pre-Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, 35-38. Tübingen.
  • Heim, J. (2012). Categorizing parasitic gaps: Which label did you use without expanding? In Pre-Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, 221-226. Tübingen.
  • Holler, S. & J. M. Hartmann (2012). Locative inversion in English: Implications of a rating study. In S. Featherston & B. Stolterfoht (eds.), Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory, 241-265. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Radó, J. & O. Bott (2012). Underspecified representations of scope ambiguity? In M. Aloni et al. (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning: Selected Papers of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, 180-189. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Winkler, S. (2012). The information structure of English. In M. Krifka & R. Musan (eds.), The Expression of Information Structure, 70-93. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Winkler, S. (2012). Focus in reduced weil-clauses in German. In J. Brandtler et al. (eds.), Discourse & Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, 487-500. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.

2011

  • Bott, O., S. Featherston, J. Radó & B. Stolterfoht (2011). The application of experimental methods in semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 1 (HSK 33.1), 303-319. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, J. M. (2011). Predicate inversion and English there-sentences. Acta Ling. Hungarica 3, 221-240.

2010

  • Klein, W. & S. Winkler (2010). Ambiguität. [Special Issue of LiLi 158].
  • Konietzko, A. & S. Winkler (2010). Contrastive ellipsis: Mapping between syntax and information structure. Lingua 120, 1436-1457.
  • Molnár, V. & S. Winkler (2010). Edges and gaps: Contrast at the interfaces. Lingua 120, 1436–1457.

2009

  • Featherston, S. & S. Winkler (2009). The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics.Volume 1: Process. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, J. M. & N. Milićević (2009). Case alternations in Serbian existentials. In G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, D. Lenertova & P. Biskup (eds.), Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure, 131-142. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Konietzko, A. (2009). Parallelism and information structure: ATB-extraction from coordinate ellipsis. In S. Featherston & S. Winkler (eds.), The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics. Volume 2: Product, 179-195. Berlin: de Gruyter.

2008

  • Culicover, P. W. & S. Winkler (2008). English focus inversion. Journal of Linguistics 44, 625-658.
  • Hartmann, J. M. (2008). Expletives in Existentials: English there and German da. Utrecht: LOT Publications.