11. November 2026 | 18:30 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
In 1983 I began fieldwork in Germany, asking not how two states diverged after 1949 but how two generations narrated the losses set in motion by 1945. What I found reshaped the question: alongside Mitgliedschaft — membership, the passport one holds — ran Zugehörigkeit, a subjective belonging independent of official status.

I open with my father, dying in a Wisconsin nursing home, unexpectedly singing Heine's "Lorelei" to a German friend, confronting me with an inheritance I had spent my life disclaiming. I track my family's nineteenth-century emigration from Germany, a loss never quite transformational, before turning to Arnim, an East Berlin research subject across four decades, whose friendship taught me that ethnographic knowledge is inseparable from the relationships, and losses, through which it is made.

The talk closes with my decision to make Berlin home — not through membership finally acquired, but through Verwandtschaft: kinship built not from blood or soil, but from a shared working-through of loss.

John Borneman, Emeritus Professor of Anthropology at Princeton University, received his Ph.D. from Harvard (1989) and taught at Cornell (1991 – 2001), and Princeton (2001 – 2022). His longterm fieldwork has been in Germany and Syria, and he has written extensively on relation of the state and law to intimacy and practices of care. In 2013 he was awarded the Boyer Prize for contributions to psychoanalytic anthropology. His most recent book is I Was Married to a Horse, and other Tales of an Accidental Anthropology, published in 2026.

Mi, 9. Dezember 2026 | 18:30 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
From the Talmudic tradition over Roman law to Islamic law, counterfactuals have populated legal history – and still prevail. While Bentham has denounced such legal fictions as a “a syphilis which runs in every vein and carries into every part of the system” of common law, others have readily welcomed law’s ‘white lies’, later culminating in a praise of both the utility and the aesthetics of legal feigning. Since fictions are indispensable means even in today’s system of legal autopoiesis, the talk will inquire in the different forms and reasons for law’s faking, from the early history of human rights to contemporary public international law.

Hans Lind ist Schrödinger-Stipendiat des Österreichischen Wissenschaftsfonds und befindet sich derzeit im Sabbatical an der Universität Wien. Zuvor lehrte er an der Universität Wien, der Yale University und der Universität Konstanz. Bevor er nach Tübingen kam, war er Gastwissenschaftler am Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht in Heidelberg. Lind hat einen Abschluss in Rechtswissenschaften von der Universität Tübingen und promovierte an der Yale University. Sein Buch Legal Fictions ist bei Routledge unter Vertrag, sein Sammelband Fictional Discourse and the Law wurde 2020 bei Routledge veröffentlicht.

Workshop on Urban Critical Zones, with Guest Prof. Kate Rigby (Köln), Respondent Prof. Evi Zemanek (Tübingen)

Do, 8. Oktober 2026 | 10:00 Uhr – 17:00 Uhr 
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin) | Common Room 

Abstract: 

The notion of urban critical zones promises to fill a gap both in critical zones studies (indexed by the absence till now of CZ observatories in cities) and in urban studies, which customarily place humans agents centre stage while relegating other actors to the status of ‘infrastructure’ and neglecting many other possible actants, thereby demanding an ‘ecologization’ of the discipline. More radically, however, the notion of urban critical zones demands that we revamp the very idea of the city as a bounded given (allowing it to be reconceptualized via the fluid, even ‘uncanny’ notion of the zone), thinking its manifold constitutive processes and flows in a non-linear fashion; and taking on board the types of agency and the repertoire of actants we understand as contributing to the dynamic process of ‘cityness’. 

(3 sessions, interspersed with lunch (catered) and afternoon coffee break). 

Workshop on Isabelle Stengers “Making Sense in Proximity” 

Di, 13. Okt, 10:00 Uhr – 16:00 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin) | Common Room 

Abstract:
Building upon Aöfred North Whitehead’s concept of ‘coherence’ (no idea makes sense without being placed in relation with the other ideas that make up the whole) and Bruno Latour’s notion of ‘matters of concern’ (issues that provide an affirmative platform for thinking rather than mere ‘critique’), Isabelle Stengers proposes a model of ‘making sense in common’ – in which our shared proximity to contemporary crises, even where our opinions may diverge radically, provides a framework for constructive – and vitally necessary – dialogue. The workshop explores what this may mean for our respective projects, whether conceptual, empirical, or activist. 

(3 sessions, interspersed with lunch (catered) and afternoon coffee break). 

Workshop on Transformations of the Humanities, with Interventions by Stephen Muecke, Russ West-Pavlov, Tim Lanzendörfer, Mamadou Dramé/René Ramírez Gallegos (virtual), Anya Heise-von der Lippe

Di, 27. Okt, 10:00 Uhr – 16:00 Uhr 
Alte Aula (Münzgasse 30)

Abstract:
This workshop interrogates the public remit and the constitutive contours of the humanities from a number of points of view: as an assemblage in a universe of distributed agency; as a group of disciplines under pressure in an age of polycrises (from climate change to shifts in the graduate labour market); and as an institutional actant susceptible of transformation by developments originating in the Global South.

(3 sessions: 1: Muecke: Composition; Respondent Lanzendörfer (10-12); 2: Heise-von der Lippe, Applied Humanities; Respondent RWP (12:15-13:45); 3: humanities from the South: RWP) (14:15-16:00); interspersed by catering and coffee break)

29. Oktober 2026 | 18.00 Uhr | Alte Aula, Münzgasse 30
(Die Veranstaltung findet auf Englisch statt.)

Indigenous Australian Philosophy is emerging as a field that translates some concepts and practices from Indigenous Australia to form a branch of Australian Philosophy, a field that is itself ephemeral. The forms of knowledge that have accumulated over many thousands of years on the continent have mostly been translated into the disciplines of anthropology, history, archaeology, linguistics and some sciences. The door to the philosophy department has, for the most part, remained closed. Young Indigenous scholars are finding ways to open the field up to the knowledge their ancestors bequeathed to them, articulating the concepts and practices found there with critical analysis, with ecological management, with totemism and animism, and with pragmatics. Articulating Indigenous Australian Philosophy in English, in writing, in seminar rooms, has its challenges. But there is no doubt something new will emerge that is relevant to the Australian, and perhaps more global, context.

Fr., 20. November 2026 | 12:00 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract: 
In 2025, Victoria became the first Australian jurisdiction to formalise a Treaty with First Peoples, acknowledging that Aboriginal sovereignty was never ceded. The Statewide Treaty Act 2025 followed a decade of negotiations. It aims to create a ‘renewed relationship’ between the State and First Peoples and advance their inherent rights and self-determination. Nonetheless, Treaty has been established at a time when Indigenous rights have been heavily politicised (nationally and globally). 

In 2023, the Australian Indigenous Voice to Parliament, which would have provided constitutional recognition of First Peoples in Australia, was defeated. The Victorian Opposition, currently leading the polls, has since vowed to abolish Treaty if they win the next election in November. Parliamentary debates have become increasingly polarised. In this presentation, I examine the friction between First Nations sovereignty and western democratic institutions, how Treaty is functioning in practice, and the consequences for this ‘renewed relationship’ when structural reform becomes temporary and threatened.

Rachel Macreadie is a Global Encounters Fellow at the University of Tübingen, Germany. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Committee Researcher for the Parliament of Victoria (2007 – 2025), and in migration policy for the International Organization for Migration in Vietnam and the Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture (as an Australian Aid Youth Ambassador for Development). She has a PhD in Translation Studies (University of Melbourne/KU Leuven) and a forthcoming book on crisis communication policies and practices (Routledge, 2027).

Fr., 4. Dezember 2026 | 12:00 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Nähere Informationen folgen. 

Fr., 22. Jan. 2027 | 12:00 Uhr
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
The Bible plays an increasingly visible role in European political discourse, particularly in the narratives and vocabulary of both religious and nonreligious Far Right movements. This may come as a surprise given the prevailing secularist approach of European policymakers to create a supposedly neutral public space (although the reality is far more complex). However, the rejection of sacred traditions has alienated conservative religious communities, who are thus drawn to these movements despite moral misgivings over extreme ideology. For populists, the Bible acts as a source of both authority with which prevailing elites may be challenged and accessible repertoire of imagery for mass communication and narrative alliances between disparate groups. Yet insofar as this resembles religious fundamentalism, we can learn from religious responses in order to overcome its entanglement with political fundamentalism — foremostly by critically reframing the historical role of the Bible as a mirror rather than a source of modern European politics. Instead of rejecting the Bible from political discourse altogether, it can be used as a source of inclusive, pluralist political imaginaries, as a venue for community reflection, and as a touchstone of dialogue, especially in interfaith contexts.
 

Sophia R.C. Johnson is a scholar of the Bible, religion, and politics. Originally from the US, Dr Johnson received her MPhil and PhD in Hebrew Bible studies from the University of Cambridge. She first came to Germany in 2022 for a research stay at George-August-Universität Göttingen funded by the DAAD before joining the DFG project “Josua postcolonial” at Ruhr-Universität Bochum in 2023. Dr. Johnson also teaches for the interdisciplinary Master’s Programme in Religion, Ethics, and Politics (MaREPol) at Technische Universität Dortmund and serves on the board of the Feminist Studies in Religion CoLaboratory.