Dr. Frank Papenmeier

^{Copyright Notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.}

Zeitschriftenartikel (peer review)

In press

• Brich, I. R., Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (in press). Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w
• Huff, M., Jacobsen, C., & Papenmeier, F. (in press). Edit blindness is not related to immersion and presence in Hollywood movies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
• von Dielingen, J., Rebholz, T. R., & Papenmeier, F. (in press). Empirical investigation of a GPT-4o mini-based tutor for the learning of R programming. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung.
• Xu, W., Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (in press). A closer look at the agent advantage effect: An eye-tracking study on event role processing in pictures. Visual Cognition.

2024

• Papenmeier, F., Dagit, G., Wagner, C., & Schwan, S. (2024). Is it art? Effects of framing images as art versus non-art on gaze behavior and aesthetic judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(4), 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000466
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Hecht, H., & Huff, M. (2024). Stereo viewing upsets cinematic continuity: Filmic cuts are more salient in 3D than in 2D movies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(4), 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000476
• Röseler, L., Kaiser, L., Doetsch, C., Klett, N., Seida, C., Schütz, A., Aczel, B., Adelina, N., Agostini, V., Alarie, S., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Aldoh, A., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Azevedo, F., Baker, B. J., Barth, C. L., Beitner, J., Brick, C., Brohmer, H., … Papenmeier, F., … Zhang, Y. (2024). The Replication Database: Documenting the replicability of psychological science. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12:8, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101
• Röseler, L., Weber, L., Helgerth, K., Stich, E., Günther, M., Tegethoff, P., Wagner, F. S., Ambrus, E., Antunovic, M., Barrera-Lemarchand, F., Halali, E., Ioannidis, K., Genschow, O., McKay, R., Milstein, N., Molden, D. C., Papenmeier, F., Pavlović, Z., Rinn, R., … Schütz, A. (2024). Correction: The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored estimates from 96 studies on anchoring effects. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12:8, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.92
• Timm, J. D., Huff, M., Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2024). Short-term transfer effects of Tetris on mental rotation: Review and registered report – a Bayesian approach. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 86(3), 1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02855-0

2023

• Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2023). Mutual interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(6), 2250-2261. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02312-3
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Jaggy, O., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2023). Long-term memory representations for audio-visual scenes. Memory & Cognition, 51, 349-370. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01355-6
• Papenmeier, F., Purcalla Arrufi, J., & Kirsch, A. (2023). Stories in the mind? The role of story-based categorizations in motion classification. Cognitive Science, 47(9), e13332. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13332
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2023). Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention. PLoS ONE, 18(2):e0281445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281445

2022

• Fröscher, L., Friedrich, A.-K., Berentelg, M., Widmer, C., Gilbert, S. J., & Papenmeier, F. (2022). Framing cognitive offloading in terms of gains or losses: Achieving a more optimal use of reminders. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00416-3
• Röseler, L., Weber, L., Helgerth, K., Stich, E., Günther, M., Tegethoff, P., Wagner, F., Antunovic, M., Barrera-Lemarchand, F., Halali, E., Ioannidis, K., Genschow, O., Milstein, N., Molden, D. C., Papenmeier, F., Pavlovic, Z., Rinn, R., Schreiter, M. L., Zimdahl, M. F., … Schütz, A. (2022). The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored estimates from 96 studies on anchoring effects. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 10:16, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.67

2021

• Grinschgl, S., Meyerhoff, H. S., Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2021). From metacognitive beliefs to strategy selection: Does fake performance feedback influence cognitive offloading? Psychological Research, 85(7), 2654-2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01435-9
• Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2021). Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(9), 1477-1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008060
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2021). Individual differences in cognitive offloading: A comparison of intention offloading, pattern copy, and short-term memory capacity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00298-x
• Papenmeier, F., & Timm. J. D. (2021). Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady & Alvarez (2011). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(3), 1329-1336. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02209-6

2020

• Grinschgl, S., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Papenmeier, F. (2020). Interface and interaction design: How mobile touch devices foster cognitive offloading. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106317
• Huff, M., Rosenfelder, D., Oberbeck, M., Merkt, M., Papenmeier, F., & Meitz, T. G. K. (2020). Cross-codal integration of bridging event information in narrative understanding. Memory & Cognition, 48, 942–956. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z
• Meyerhoff, H. S., & Papenmeier, F. (2020). Individual differences in visual attention: A short, reliable, open-source, and multilingual test of multiple object tracking in PsychoPy. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 2556-2566. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01413-4
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2020). (Re-)organization of spatial configurations in visual working memory: The fate of objects rendered relevant or irrelevant by selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(12), 2246-2259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820951130

2019

• Papenmeier, F., Boss, A., & Mahlke, A-K. (2019). Action goal changes caused by agents and patients both induce global updating of event models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 1441-1454. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000651
• Papenmeier, F., Brockhoff, A., & Huff, M. (2019). Filling the gap despite full attention: the role of fast backward inferences for event completion. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0151-2
• Papenmeier, F., Maurer, A. E., & Huff, M. (2019). Linguistic information in auditory dynamic events contributes to the detection of fine, not coarse event boundaries. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 30–40
• Papenmeier, F., Uhrig, M., & Kirsch, A. (2019). Human understanding of robot motion: The role of velocity and orientation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0493-4
• Timm, J.D. & Papenmeier, F. (2019). Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory: A matter of set size? PLoS ONE, 14(11):e0225068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225068
• Timm, J.D. & Papenmeier, F. (2019). Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 47(8), 1469-1480. doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00944-2

2018

• Huff, M., Maurer, A. E., Brich, I., Pagenkopf, A., Wickelmaier, F., & Papenmeier, F. (2018). Construction and updating of event models in auditory event processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 307-320. doi:10.1037/xlm0000482

2017

• Huff, M.*, & Papenmeier, F.* (2017). Event perception: From event boundaries to ongoing events. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 129-132. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.003
  *: Geteilte Erstautorenschaft
• Huff, M.*, & Papenmeier, F.*, Maurer, A. E., Meitz, T. G. K., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2017). Fandom biases retrospective judgments not perception. Scientific Reports, 7, 43083. doi:10.1038/srep43083
  *: Geteilte Erstautorenschaft
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2017). Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1255-1274. doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1338-1.
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Brockhoff, A., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2017). Upside-down: Perceived space affects object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1269-1274. doi:10.1037/xhp0000421

2016

• Adam, M., Henrichs, I., Papenmeier, F., Gredebäck, G., Elsner, C., & Elsner, B. (2016). Goal saliency boosts infants’ action prediction for human manual actions, but not for mechanical claws. Infant Behavior and Development, 44, 29-37. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.05.001
• Brockhoff, A., Huff, M., Maurer, A., & Papenmeier, F. (2016). Seeing the unseen? Illusory causal filling in FIFA referees, players, and novices. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1:7. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0008-5
• Brockhoff, A., Papenmeier, F., Wolf, K., Pfeiffer, T., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2016). Viewpoint matters: Exploring the involvement of reference frames in multiple object tracking from a developmental perspective. Cognitive Development, 37, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.004
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2016). Not FLEXible enough: Exploring the temporal dynamics of attentional reallocations with the multiple object tracking paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 776-787. doi:10.1037/xhp0000187
• Papenmeier, F., & Schwan, S. (2016). If you watch it move, you'll recognize it in 3D: Transfer of depth cues between encoding and retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 164, 90-95. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.010

2015

• Meyerhoff. H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M (2015). Distractor locations influence multiple object tracking beyond interobject spacing: Evidence from equidistant distractor displacements. Experimental Psychology, 62, 170-180. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000283
• Papenmeier, F. (2015). Kognition im Kontext: Einfluss der Lernsituation und gleichzeitig memorierter Inhalte auf die Speicherung im Arbeitsgedächtnis. Das In-Mind Magazin, 4.

2014

• Huff, M., Meitz, T.G.K, & Papenmeier, F. (2014). Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audio-visual narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1377-1388. doi:10.1037/a0036780
• Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2014). Viewpoint-dependent representation of contextual information in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 663-668. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0632-4
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhofff, H.S., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2014). Tracking by location and features: Object correspondence across spatiotemporal discontinuities during multiple objekt tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 159-171. doi:10.1037/a0033117

2013

• Huff, M.*, & Papenmeier, F.* (2013). It is time to integrate: The temporal dynamics of object motion and texture motion integration in multiple object tracking. Vision Research, 76, 25-30. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.001
  *: Geteilte Erstautorenschaft
• Meyerhoff, H.S., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2013). Object-based integration of motion information during attentive tracking. Perception, 42, 119-121. doi:10.1068/p7273
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G. & Huff, M. (2013). A single unexpected change in target- but not distractor motion impairs multiple object tracking. i-Perception, 4(1), 81–83. doi:10.1068/i0567sas

2012

• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 848-864. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.705359
• Jahn, G., Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H.S., & Huff, M. (2012). Spatial reference in multiple object tracking. Experimental Psychology, 59, 163-173. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000139
• Jahn, G., Wendt, J., Lotze, M., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2012). Brain activation during spatial updating and attentive tracking of moving targets. Brain and Cognition, 78, 105-113. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.001
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012). Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 397-415. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0242-3

2011

• Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G, & Schwan, S. (2011). Continuous visual cues trigger automatic spatial target updating in dynamic scenes. Cognition, 121, 73-82. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.001

2010

• Huff, M., Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., & Jahn, G. (2010). Spatial updating of dynamic scenes: Tracking multiple invisible objects across viewpoint changes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 628-636. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.628
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). Eye movements across viewpoint changes in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 18(9), 1368-1391. doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.495878
• Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2010). DynAOI: A tool for matching eye movement data with dynamic areas of interest in animations and movies. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 179-187. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.179

Buchkapitel

• Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2017). Learning from animations: From 2D to 3D? In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization: Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer.

Konferenz Präsentationen und Vorträge

• Papenmeier, F., Brich, I., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (2024, Juni 27-28). Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension. Visual Language (VisLang) Conference 2024, Tilburg, Netherlands.
• Xu, W., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2024, Juni 27-28). A closer look at the agent advantage effect: The impact of motion lines. Visual Language (VisLang) Conference 2024, Tilburg, Netherlands.
• Brich, I., Schenk, A., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2023, März 26-29). Text in comics: Cross-codal information integration during visual narrative comprehension. 65th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Trier, Germany. (Talk given by Frank Papenmeier)
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Naton, N., Papenmeier, F., & Gilbert, S. (2023, März 26-29). Cognitive offloading impairs memory accuracy in an intention offloading task. 65th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Trier, Germany.
• Papenmeier, F., Fröscher, L., Friedrich, A.-K., Berentelg, M., Widmer, C., & Gilbert, S. J. (2022, März 20-23). Framing cognitive offloading in terms of gains or losses: Achieving a more optimal use of reminders. 64th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Köln, Germany.
• Papenmeier, F., Fröscher, L., Friedrich, A.-K., Berentelg, M., & Gilbert, S. J. (2021, Juli 15-16). Framing reminders as gains or losses affects the reminder bias for delayed intentions. Cognitive Offloading Meeting 2021.
• Brich, I. R., Henner, J., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2021, März 14-16). Cross-codal information integration in narrative comprehension occurs immediately upon encounter. 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Ulm, Germany.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2021, März 14-16). Individual differences in cognitive offloading: A comparison of intention offloading, pattern copy, and working memory capacity. 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Ulm, Germany.
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2020, Juni). Eye movements support processing spatial configurations in visual working memory. Virtual-Vision Sciences Society's 20th Annual Meeting (V-VSS). St. Pete Beach, FL, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., & Timm, J. D. (2020, März). Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory. 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP). Jena, Germany. (Tagung wegen des Coronavirus-Ausbruchs 2019/20 abgesagt)
• Timm, J. D., & Papenmeier, F. (2020, März). Spatial context supports object memory in a viewpoint-dependent manner – an investigation using an immersive virtual environment. 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP). Jena, Germany. (Tagung wegen des Coronavirus-Ausbruchs 2019/20 abgesagt)
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Gäbele, C. (2019, September). Event completion despite temporal ellipses. 21st meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP). Teneriffa, Spanien.
• Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2019, September). Offloading working memory improves performance but impairs long-term memory. 21st meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP). Teneriffa, Spanien.
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2019, September). Processing spatial configurations in visual working memory. 21st meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP). Teneriffa, Spanien.
• Papenmeier, F., Boss, A., & Mahlke, A-K. (2018, November). Action goal changes caused by agents and patients both induce global updating of event models. Psychonomic Society's 59th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, USA.
• Papenmeier, F. (2018, September). Studying the comprehension of dynamic scenes and events with the viewing time paradigm. 51. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Frankfurt am Main.
• Papenmeier, F., Brockhoff, A., & Huff, M. (2018, März). The completion of missing information during coherent events is caused by backward inferences rather than predictive perception. 60. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Marburg.
• Papenmeier, F., Mahlke, A., & Boss, A. (2017, März). Action goal changes induced by agents and patients both cause the updating of event models. 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Dresden.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Maurer, A., Meitz, T. G. K., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2017, März). They saw one game: Retrospective judgments, not online processing is biased by fandom. 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Dresden.
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H., Brockhoff, A., Jahn, G, & Huff, M. (2016, März). Upside-Down: Static Reference Frames influence Multiple Object Tracking. 58. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Heidelberg.
• Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2015, März). Semantic relations in pictures: An eye-tracking study. 57. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Hildesheim.
• Brockhoff, A., Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2014, September). Der Einfluss von Objektgeschwindigkeit beim Multiple-Object Tracking. 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Bochum.
• Huff, M., Meitz, T., & Papenmeier, F. (2014, September). Änderungen im Situationsmodell modulieren Gedächtnis, Vorhersageleistung und Blickbewegungen in audiovisuellen Erzählungen. 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Bochum.
• Maurer, A., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2014, September). Wahrnehmung auditiver Erzählungen: Die Rolle zentraler und peripherer Information für die Prozesse der Ereigniswahrnehmung. 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Bochum.
• Papenmeier, F., Schwan, S., Meitz, T., Maurer, A. & Huff, M. (2014, September). Nahmen BVB-Fans und FCB-Fans das Champions-League-Finale 2013 unterschiedlich wahr? Einfluss der Fanzugehörigkeit auf die kognitive Verarbeitung von Sportübertragungen. 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Bochum.
• Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2014, April). Contextual information in visual working memory is viewpoint-dependent. 56. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Gießen.
• Papenmeier, F., Sering, K., & Huff, M. (2013, August). Gaze coherence in movies: Adaptations to the normalized scanpath saliency. 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM). Lund, Sweden.
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2012, September). Automatic correspondence by surface features during visual tracking across spatiotemporal discontinuities. 35th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP). Alghero, Italy.
• Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2012, April). Changes in goal-directed actions modulate visual attention over time. 54. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Mannheim.
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2012, April). Automatic correspondence by surface features across spatiotemporal discontinuities during tracking. 54. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Mannheim.
• Jahn, G., Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Huff, M. (2011, März). Farbe und Konfiguration zur Lösung des Korrespondenzproblems für Verfolgungsziele in dynamischen Szenen. 53. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Halle.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2011, März). Multiple Object Tracking: Positionssensitive Distraktorinhibition beim Verfolgen mehrerer bewegter Objekte. 53. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Halle.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2011, März). Dynamische räumliche Inter-Objekt-Relationen im visuellen Kurzzeitgedächtnis. 53. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Halle.
• Jahn, G., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2010, September). Räumliche Referenz beim Verfolgen mehrerer bewegter Objekte. 47. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs). Bremen.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., Jahn, G., & Hesse, F. (2010, September). Blickbewegungen beim Multiple Object Tracking: Gruppierung von Zielobjekten. 47. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPS). Bremen.
• Jahn, G., Wendt, J., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2010, März). Dynamische visuelle Aufmerksamkeit beim Verfolgen temporär unsichtbarer Zielobjekte. 52. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Saarbrücken.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2010, März). Automatische Aktualisierung räumlicher Informationen während Szenenrotationen. 52. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Saarbrücken.
• Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2010, März). Bedeutung von Target-Distraktor-Relationen beim Multiple Object Tracking. 52. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Saarbrücken.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Jahn, G. (2009, März). Stabilität von Blick-Objekt-Relationen beim gleichzeitigen Verfolgen mehrerer Objekte: Einfluss abrupter Perspektivenwechsel. 51. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Jena.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2009, März). Aufmerksamkeit und abrupte Perspektivenwechsel beim Multiple Object Tracking: Existenz einer Reorientierungsphase? 51. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Jena.
• Jahn, G., Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2008, August). Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes. Max Planck Institut für biologische Kybernetik. Tübingen.
• Fischer, S., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2007, November). Dynamic AOIs by the use of Blenders 3D-engine. Eye Tracking and Multimedia Workshop. University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.

Poster Präsentationen

• Capuano, F., Papenmeier, F., & Kaup, B. (2024, März 17-20). The time course of negation processing - a priming study. 66th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Regensburg, Germany.
• Hamaloğlu, S., Huff, M., Fleming, S., Anders, G., Papenmeier, F., & Said, N. (2024, März 17-20). Metacognition and the event completion paradigm: The role of metacognitive sensitivity during event perception. 66th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Regensburg, Germany.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., Schwan, S., & Timm, J. D. (2024, März 17-20). Short-term transfer effects of Tetris on mental rotation: Review and registered report – a Bayesian approach. 66th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Regensburg, Germany.
  [Awarded with the TeaP 2024 Selected Poster Award, Second Place]
• Papenmeier, F., Korbanka, T., Timm, J., & Huff, M. (2023, März 26-29). Helping robots in the presence of bystanders. 65th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Trier, Germany.
• Xu, W., Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2023, März 26-29). A closer look at the agent advantage effect: agent benefit or patient cost? 65th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Trier, Germany.
• Papenmeier, F., & Timm, J. D. (2021, März 14-16). Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady & Alvarez (2011). 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP), Ulm, Germany.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., & Papenmeier, F. (2020, März). Individual differences in visual attention: A short, reliable, open source, and multilingual test of Multiple Object Tracking in PsychoPy. 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP). Jena, Germany. (Tagung wegen des Coronavirus-Ausbruchs 2019/20 abgesagt)
• Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2020, März). Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory. 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP). Jena, Germany. (Tagung wegen des Coronavirus-Ausbruchs 2019/20 abgesagt)
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2019, Mai). Eye movements are required to process spatial configurations in visual working memory. Vision Sciences Society's 19th Annual Meeting (VSS). St. Pete Beach, FL, USA.
• Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2018, November). The impact of working memory capacity and tool design on cognitive offloading. Psychonomic Society's 59th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, USA.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Merkt, M. (2018, November). Visual narrative continuity: Processing event boundaries in visual narratives. Psychonomic Society's 59th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, USA.
• Timm, J. D. & Papenmeier, F. (2018, November). Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory. Psychonomic Society's 59th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, USA.
• Timm, J. D., & Papenmeier, F. (2018, März). Reorganization of spatial configurations during encoding and memorization. 60. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Marburg.
• Huff, M., Brockhoff, A., Maurer, A., & Papenmeier, F. (2016, November). Seeing the unseen? Illusory causal fillings in FIFA referees, players, and novices. Psychonomic Society's 57th Annual Meeting. Boston, USA.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2016, November). Visual activity prolongs perceived duration in naturalistic scenes. Psychonomic Society's 57th Annual Meeting. Boston, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., Meitz, T. G. K., & Huff, M. (2016, November). A closer look at the updating of situation models in audio­visual narratives: An eye­tracking study. Psychonomic Society's 57th Annual Meeting. Boston, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Brockhoff, A., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2016, November). Upside-Down: Perceived Space Affects Object-Based Attention. 24th Annual Meeting on Object Perception, Attention, and Memory (OPAM). Boston, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., Henrichs, I., & Elsner, B. (2015, November). The role of location and identity in predicting action targets. Psychonomic Society's 56th Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Meilinger, T., & de la Rosa, S. (2015, März). Semantic relations in asymmetric dynamic social interactions. 57. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Hildesheim.
• Brockhoff, A., Papenmeier, F., Wolf, K., Pfeiffer, T. J., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2014, April). Retinocentric and allocentric processes in multiple object tracking in children. 56. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Gießen.
• Papenmeier, F., & Schwan, S. (2013, November). Detecting changes with stereoscopic displays: No encoding benefit but recognition benefit. 21st Annual Meeting on Object Perception, Attention, and Memory (OPAM). Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  [Awarded with the OPAM 2013 Best Poster Award]
• Huff, M., Meitz, T. G. K., & Papenmeier, F. (2013, November). Changes in situation models modulate gaze behavior, memory and prediction performance in motion pictures. The Psychonomic Society 2013 Annual Meeting. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
• Henrichs, I., Papenmeier, F., Hellner, A., & Elsner, B. (2012, October). Location or Feature: 14-month-old infants’ predictive gaze shifts are influenced more by goal location than by goal identity. Novel Methods in Developmental Research. Uppsala, Sweden.
• Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2012, September). The use of motion information in multiple object tracking. 35th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP). Alghero, Italy.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2011, November). Inhibition in multiple object tracking does not bushwhack, but follow distractors. Object Perception, Attention, & Memory (OPAM). Seattle, Washington, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2011, November). Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory. 52nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Seattle, Washington, USA.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Jahn, G. (2011, May). Maintaining visual spatial attention across abrupt spatiotemporal discontinuities: The role of feature information. Vision Sciences Society 11th Annual Meeting. Naples, Florida, USA.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2011, May). Distractor inhibition during attentive tracking is location sensitive. Vision Sciences Society 11th Annual Meeting. Naples, Florida, USA.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2010, November). The importance of continuous scene information for multiple object tracking and target updating. 51st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2010, November). Spatial updating during attentive tracking. Object Perception, Attention, & Memory (OPAM). St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Jahn, G. (2010, May). The spatial representation in multiple-object tracking. Vision Sciences Society 10th Annual Meeting. Naples, Florida, USA.
• Jahn, G., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2010, May). Spatial reference in multiple object tracking. Vision Sciences Society 10th Annual Meeting. Naples, Florida, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., Jahn, G., & Hesse, F.W. (2010, May). Eye movements across scene rotations in multiple object tracking. Vision Sciences Society 10th Annual Meeting. Naples, Florida, USA.
• Huff, M., Jahn, G., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2009, November). Apparent scene rotation in updating locations of invisible moving objects. Object Perception, Attention, & Memory (OPAM). Boston, USA.
• Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2009, November). Matching gaze data with static and dynamic objects using the tool DynAOI. Object Perception, Attention, & Memory (OPAM). Boston, USA.
• Jahn, G., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2009, August). Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes. 32nd European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP). Regensburg.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Jahn, G. (2009, August). Eye movements across viewpoint changes in multiple object tracking. 32nd European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP). Regensburg.
• Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2008, März). Erleichtert eine statische saliente Referenzmarkierung das Verfolgen mehrerer bewegter Objekte in dreidimensionalen Szenen über Perspektivenwechsel hinweg? 50. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Marburg.