War creates extreme social and political situations that increase the need for religious explanations. Significant elements of the monotheist traditions are based on religious explanations of war experiences and are evident in a variety of mutations in the modern era. Divine assistance in victory, war and guilt, the “history of God with his people,” war as the apocalypse, the battle of good against evil—these all played a role, even where they were reinterpreted as “secular transcendental,” explicitly denied, or implicitly dismissed.
Scholars—including us—have primarily defined the functional relationship of religion and war in the modern era in terms of “legitimation” or “consolation.” But religion has yet another function, even in the twentieth century, as a means of communication for models of meaning embedded within experience but also constitutive of it. The relationship of religious and secular models for interpreting war are thus a central object of study in project area G and its central axis.