> For many students, the topic of „Auschwitz“ is not a „tear-jerker“. They may present indirect or direct resistance against the subject because they „can't hear about it anymore“. Teachers reference the Holocaust in many subjects (e.g., Literature, History, Social Studies, etc.), so students often feel they hear about it too much. Some students have even come to a point of questioning „why Germany is always in the dock.“ They ask, „Why are Germans always on trial for crimes committed so long ago?“ Alternatively, some students leave their studies saying, „Elie Wiesel's book is the most important book I have ever read.“ Others even believe Elie Wiesel’s work should be compulsory material in public curricula, so all students in Germany will be required to read it. – How do such different opinions come about from the same material?
> To change these views and engage students, contrast these comments with feedback from students who have already studied Elie Wiesel in class. For example, comments like the following may be helpful: „For the first time, we approached this topic from a completely new perspective — not just through numbers and statistics.“
> Recent studies, such as the Bodo von Borries study on the historical consciousness of young Germans, have shown that young people are overloaded by the topic of Germany’s Nazi past. They’re constantly fed reactions and reminders of the topic by the media, their families, and schools — all of which attach extreme importance to the topic, whether positive or negative. For example, students are acutely aware of the agitation in their teachers, principals, caretakers, and the police when Nazi imagery, such as swastikas, appear in public spaces. In addition, many young Germans report disparaging feelings and experiences when traveling abroad (often related to public opinions of Germany), however subtly.
> To relate the content to more pressing questions for teenagers and adolescents, start by engaging with their fundamental concerns: „Where do I stand in the world?“, „Where do I belong?“. Then explore these thoughts from a historical perspective with personal questions: „Where do I come from?“, „What is my (family and social) history?“
> The religious question of the Holocaust also concerns young people. While it’s often not explicit at first, students given time and space with the content may express concerns about the question of God in the face of such evil: „How can God allow ethnic cleansing, murder, and expulsions in Kosovo and elsewhere?“, „Why does God let little children starve to death?“, „Why didn't God intervene in the Holocaust?“
> Encouraging young students to ask difficult questions and taking them seriously is the first task of a religious educator. Creating an open, safe space where challenging questions can be asked enables teachers to break down reactions from the class and build more impactful lessons.
> It is crucial that the students can react openly to responses to Elie Wiesel, the horrors of Auschwitz, and the question of God and the Holocaust. To prevent demoralizing students or burdening them with an emotional overload, the teacher must help them cognitively and affectively deal with course content. It is not pure didactics of mediation that lead the conversation further but correlative approaches that integrate, dialogical-creative didactic appropriations.
> Particularly for the question of God in the context of Auschwitz, it is essential to lead students to an active discussion that extends beyond the classroom. Elie Wiesel’s works are particularly suitable for this purpose, as they lead readers directly to both questions of doubt and moments of faith in God's justice.
> The established teaching modules U1, U2, U3, etc., and materials M1, M2, and M3 can be used in Hauptschule, Realschule, and Gymnasium, especially in grades 9 and 10. They can be used together to form an academic arc or serve as individual curriculum topics such as the church under National Socialism, faith in God today, Judaism, or human rights. A more precise classification of each course is deliberately omitted to require instructors to deal with them individually and creatively.