11 November 2026 | 6:30 pm
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
In 1983 I began fieldwork in Germany, asking not how two states diverged after 1949 but how two generations narrated the losses set in motion by 1945. What I found reshaped the question: alongside Mitgliedschaft — membership, the passport one holds — ran Zugehörigkeit, a subjective belonging independent of official status.

I open with my father, dying in a Wisconsin nursing home, unexpectedly singing Heine's "Lorelei" to a German friend, confronting me with an inheritance I had spent my life disclaiming. I track my family's nineteenth-century emigration from Germany, a loss never quite transformational, before turning to Arnim, an East Berlin research subject across four decades, whose friendship taught me that ethnographic knowledge is inseparable from the relationships, and losses, through which it is made.

The talk closes with my decision to make Berlin home — not through membership finally acquired, but through Verwandtschaft: kinship built not from blood or soil, but from a shared working-through of loss.

John Borneman, Emeritus Professor of Anthropology at Princeton University, received his Ph.D. from Harvard (1989) and taught at Cornell (1991 – 2001), and Princeton (2001 – 2022). His longterm fieldwork has been in Germany and Syria, and he has written extensively on relation of the state and law to intimacy and practices of care. In 2013 he was awarded the Boyer Prize for contributions to psychoanalytic anthropology. His most recent book is I Was Married to a Horse, and other Tales of an Accidental Anthropology, published in 2026.

Wed. 9 December 2026 | 6:30 pm
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
From the Talmudic tradition over Roman law to Islamic law, counterfactuals have populated legal history – and still prevail. While Bentham has denounced such legal fictions as a “a syphilis which runs in every vein and carries into every part of the system” of common law, others have readily welcomed law’s ‘white lies’, later culminating in a praise of both the utility and the aesthetics of legal feigning. Since fictions are indispensable means even in today’s system of legal autopoiesis, the talk will inquire in the different forms and reasons for law’s faking, from the early history of human rights to contemporary public international law.

Hans Lind is a Schrödinger Fellow of the Austrian Science fund and is currently in a sabbatical at the University of Vienna. Before, he taught at the Universities of Vienna, Yale and Konstanz. He was a visiting researcher at the Max-Planck-Institute for comparative public law and international law in Heidelberg before he came to Tübingen. Lind holds a degree in Law / Legal Studies from the University of Tübingen and earned his doctorate degree at Yale University. His Book Legal Fictions was published by Routledge, his collected volume Fictional Discourse and the Law was published by Routledge in 2020.

Wed, 20 January 2027 | 6:30pm
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)
 

Further information will follow soon. 

Workshop on Transformations of the Humanities

Tue 27 Oct, 10:00 am – 4:00 pm
College of Fellows (Common Room) 

Abstract: 
This workshop interrogates the public remit and the constitutive contours of the humanities from a number of points of view: as an assemblage in a universe of distributed agency; as a group of disciplines under pressure in an age of polycrises (from climate change to shifts in the graduate labour market); and as an institutional actant susceptible of transformation by developments originating in the Global South.

Programme: 

Session 1: 10:00-12:00: Introduction, Presentations Russ West-Pavlov: The Proximate/Public Humanities

• READING: West-Pavlov, ‘Deterritorializing the Humanities’ (Manuscript).

Lunch break: 12:00-12:30

Lunch break: 12:00-12:30

Session 2: 12:30-14:00 – Stephen Muecke, Experimental Humanities 

• READING: Muecke, ‘An Ecology of Institutions: Recomposing the Humanities’; Muecke, ‘Illusion of Proximity’, Pt. 2 (Manuscript)

Coffee break: 14:30-15:00

Session 3: 15:30-16:00 – Stephen Muecke, group work: (1) Composing Our Humanities; (2) Re-Imagining the Humanities

Please follow this link to access the reading material.

29 October 2026, 6:00 pm 
 Alte Aula (Münzgasse 30)

Abstract: 
Indigenous Australian Philosophy is emerging as a field that translates some concepts and practices from Indigenous Australia to form a branch of Australian Philosophy, a field that is itself ephemeral. The forms of knowledge that have accumulated over many thousands of years on the continent have mostly been translated into the disciplines of anthropology, history, archaeology, linguistics and some sciences. The door to the philosophy department has, for the most part, remained closed. Young Indigenous scholars are finding ways to open the field up to the knowledge their ancestors bequeathed to them, articulating the concepts and practices found there with critical analysis, with ecological management, with totemism and animism, and with pragmatics. Articulating Indigenous Australian Philosophy in English, in writing, in seminar rooms, has its challenges. But there is no doubt something new will emerge that is relevant to the Australian, and perhaps more global, context.

Fri. 20 November 2026 | 12:00 am
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract: 
In 2025, Victoria became the first Australian jurisdiction to formalise a Treaty with First Peoples, acknowledging that Aboriginal sovereignty was never ceded. The Statewide Treaty Act 2025 followed a decade of negotiations. It aims to create a ‘renewed relationship’ between the State and First Peoples and advance their inherent rights and self-determination. Nonetheless, Treaty has been established at a time when Indigenous rights have been heavily politicised (nationally and globally). 

In 2023, the Australian Indigenous Voice to Parliament, which would have provided constitutional recognition of First Peoples in Australia, was defeated. The Victorian Opposition, currently leading the polls, has since vowed to abolish Treaty if they win the next election in November. Parliamentary debates have become increasingly polarised. In this presentation, I examine the friction between First Nations sovereignty and western democratic institutions, how Treaty is functioning in practice, and the consequences for this ‘renewed relationship’ when structural reform becomes temporary and threatened.

Rachel Macreadie is a Global Encounters Fellow at the University of Tübingen, Germany. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Committee Researcher for the Parliament of Victoria (2007 – 2025), and in migration policy for the International Organization for Migration in Vietnam and the Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture (as an Australian Aid Youth Ambassador for Development). She has a PhD in Translation Studies (University of Melbourne/KU Leuven) and a forthcoming book on crisis communication policies and practices (Routledge, 2027).

Fri. 4 December 2026 | 12:00 pm
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Further information will follow.

Fri. 22 January 2027 | 12:00 pm
College of Fellows (Rümelinstr. 27/Villa Köstlin)

Abstract:
The Bible plays an increasingly visible role in European political discourse, particularly in the narratives and vocabulary of both religious and nonreligious Far Right movements. This may come as a surprise given the prevailing secularist approach of European policymakers to create a supposedly neutral public space (although the reality is far more complex). However, the rejection of sacred traditions has alienated conservative religious communities, who are thus drawn to these movements despite moral misgivings over extreme ideology. For populists, the Bible acts as a source of both authority with which prevailing elites may be challenged and accessible repertoire of imagery for mass communication and narrative alliances between disparate groups. Yet insofar as this resembles religious fundamentalism, we can learn from religious responses in order to overcome its entanglement with political fundamentalism — foremostly by critically reframing the historical role of the Bible as a mirror rather than a source of modern European politics. Instead of rejecting the Bible from political discourse altogether, it can be used as a source of inclusive, pluralist political imaginaries, as a venue for community reflection, and as a touchstone of dialogue, especially in interfaith contexts.
 

Sophia R.C. Johnson is a scholar of the Bible, religion, and politics. Originally from the US, Dr Johnson received her MPhil and PhD in Hebrew Bible studies from the University of Cambridge. She first came to Germany in 2022 for a research stay at George-August-Universität Göttingen funded by the DAAD before joining the DFG project “Josua postcolonial” at Ruhr-Universität Bochum in 2023. Dr. Johnson also teaches for the interdisciplinary Master’s Programme in Religion, Ethics, and Politics (MaREPol) at Technische Universität Dortmund and serves on the board of the Feminist Studies in Religion CoLaboratory.