Journal Club Winter Term 2017/18
Day, time & location:
During term time:
Mondays from 10:30 till 12:00 hrs, weekly, starting on October 23rd, 2017
72076 Tübingen, Sand 6, room F230
Students can obtain 2 ECTS for the active participation in the Journal Club (non graded, only pass or fail). Active participation implies, first, that students have to present at least one paper during term. Second, they have to attend the Journal Club regularly: non-attendance will only be tolerated once per term (unless the student provides a doctor's note).
Finally, the number of participants at the Journal Club is strictly limited to 10, and members of the NIP lab take precedence over external students. Thus in practice there is a limit of 2, 3 or maximally 4 external students per term, depending on the number of current NIP lab members.
| date | presenter | paper |
|---|---|---|
| 23.10.2017 | Tom Wallis | Introduction and paper assignment |
| 30.10.2017 | – | no journal club |
| 06.11.2017 | Tom Wallis | Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. (target article) |
| 13.11.2017 | Bernhard Lang | Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. (commentaries and reply) |
| 20.11.2017 | Jonathan Österle | Stein, T., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Content-Specific Expectations Enhance Stimulus Detectability by Increasing Perceptual Sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi.org/10.1037/xge0000109 |
| 27.11.2017 | Uli Wannek | Witzel, C., & Hansen, T. (2015). Memory effects on color perception. In A. J. Elliot, M. D. Fairchild, & A. Franklin (Eds.), Handbook of Color Psychology (pp. 641–659). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337930.032 |
| 04.12.2017 | Jan Lause | Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 |
| 11.12.2017 | Tom Wallis | Neri, P. (2017). Object segmentation controls image reconstruction from natural scenes. PLOS Biology, 15(8), e1002611. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002611 |
| 18.12.2017 | Wiebke Ringels | Jogan, M., & Stocker, A. (2014). A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 1–18. doi.org/10.1167/14.3.20.doi |
| 25.12.2017 | – | holiday |
| 01.01.2018 | – | holiday |
| 08.01.2018 | Jan Lause | Storrs, K. R. (2015). Are high-level aftereffects perceptual? Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00157 AND Morgan, M. J. (2014). A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation. Journal of Vision, 14(1). |
| 15.01.2018 | open | |
| 22.01.2018 | Felix Wichmann | Finlayson, N. J., Papageorgiou, A., & Schwarzkopf, D. S. (2017). A new method for mapping perceptual biases across visual space. Journal of Vision, 17(9), 5. doi.org/10.1167/17.9.5 |
| 29.01.2018 | Heiko Schütt | Sridharan, D., Steinmetz, N. A., Moore, T., & Knudsen, E. I. (2014). Distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks. Journal of Vision, 14(9), 16–16. doi.org/10.1167/14.9.16 |
05.02.2018 | open |