Contact person: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Schmitz, Dr. Veronika Lukas (Munich)
Projekt Homepage: <http://www.benedictus.mgh.de/>
The project of critically editing the capitulary collection of Benedictus Levita, which was composed by the Pseudo-Isidorian forgers or by someone close to them and which comprises three books with a total of more than 1700 chapters and purports to be a continuation of the much smaller Collectio of Abbot Ansegis of Fontanelle, has a long and troublesome history.
Researchers still have to rely on the edition prepared by Étienne Baluze in 1677, which was an excellent achievement in its time, but does no longer meet modern requirements.
The edition that appeared in 1837 within the MGH Leges is basically just a revised reprint of Baluze's work: Pertz was not very much interested in Benedictus Levita, as he believed amongst other things that this collection – contrary to Ansegis's collection – "had never been in official use in Germany." That is why he had young Ludwig Bethmann only compare the text with the Gotha manuscript I 84 (then unknown to Baluze) and Friedrich Heinrich Knust prepare an analysis of the sources. Thus he wanted to create a "makeshift improvement" of Baluze's edition, which he otherwise held in high regard, and "leave it to posterity to do more work on the text". The result was a strange mixture of texts, which was on the whole not better than what had been provided by Baluze, and in some places even worse.
Thus there was no denying that the collection of Benedictus was amongst the more pressing desiderata for a critical edition, when, as the Folio edition had gone out of print, the Zentraldirektion decided to prepare a new edition and when the studies by Alfred Boretius had shown that Pertz's edition was in need of a revision. But neither Boretius nor his designated successor, the very talented Victor Krause, ever touched the text. Krause died 1891 while proofreading the index of his second volume of capitularies at the age of just 31 years.
That very year the Zentraldirektion assigned the task to Emil Seckel, then a young private lecturer at the university of Berlin. Seckel worked on Benedictus Levita until his death in 1924: He did groundbreaking work on the sources of Benedictus, but did not yet tackle the edition itself. Seckel's successor, Josef Juncker, continued the studies on the sources, but he also got stuck in the beginnings of the critical edition. Anyway, he is most probably responsible for the strange text samples which are kept as "schedulae pseudoisidorianae" in the archives of the Monumenta.
After Juncker's death in 1938 Johannes Hollnsteiner was tasked with the continuation of the work, but he made no discernible contributions. And thus the whole project died off. In 1972 Horst Fuhrmann remarked succinctly: "A new edition of the capitulary collection of Benedictus Levita is currently not planned within the MG."
It was only in 1998 that the Zentraldirektion decided to resume work on the project: Both an edition in book form and an online edition are planned. (Schmitz)