Municipal services: co-determined, social, climate-neutral?
Conditions for success in socio-ecological transformation
The research project "Municipal services: co-determined, social, climate-neutral?" is funded by the Hans Böckler Foundation and is located at the F.A.T.K and at the Institute of Political Science at the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen.
Municipalities and municipal companies providing services of general interest are considered to play an important role in the socio-ecological transformation. In this context, the research team investigates the handling of climate protection requirements in the fields of energy, waste disposal and public transport as well as the potential of municipalities as "key actors" in the mitigation of climate change and asks what role employees and co-determination play in this context.
Climate change mitigation and adaptation are becoming increasingly important also in municipalities and municipal enterprises. They are responsible for ensuring the provision of existential services and goods for the population, even under the conditions of climate change, for guaranteeing equal living conditions and opportunities for participation, but also for solving self-inflicted ecological problems and realizing potential savings.
In the municipalities, there are various fields of action to pursue climate and sustainability goals. Presumably, it will be a decisive factor whether and how climate policy, economic interests and the interests of employees can be coordinated in such a way that climate measures do not fail due to resistance from employees who also have legitimate social concerns. Works councils and staff councils, employee representatives on supervisory boards and the trade unions have an important task here.
2. Research Question
The project aims to investigate, from an actor-centered perspective, firstly, what demands municipal utility companies in the sectors energy, waste disposal and public transport are confronted with in terms of climate and environmental protection, what measures are taken and what factors tend to promote or hinder their implementation. Second, we will look into the role of employees in the transformation process. The focus will be on the content and forms of company negotiation and participation processes and, if applicable, on the conflicts associated with them. The conditions under which it is possible to reconcile employee interests and initiatives for ecological transformation will be investigated. Finally, we will ask for the potential of municipalities and their infrastructure companies as key actors in the socio-ecological transformation.
3. Research Methods
Empirically, the project is based on a total of 90 interviews and group discussions. In addition to 10 explorative interviews with external experts, 66 interviews with company and staff representatives and 12-14 group discussions with employees will be conducted in the municipalities and the infrastructure companies. Supplemented by document analyses, 12-15 company case studies, including 6 intensive case studies, will be conducted on this basis. We rely mainly on the analytical heuristics of actor-centered institutionalism, but extend them with innovation and recognition theory as well as network and discourse theory considerations. Beyond the scientific analysis, it will be examined under which conditions the socio-ecological transformation can be successfully shaped in municipal enterprises and whether best practice examples can be identified.
For further information, follow this link.
Comparative climate change policy analysis in cities in California and Baden-Württemberg
The research project "Comparative climate change policy analysis in cities in California and Baden-Württemberg" has been funded by the initiative "Creating Climate Change Collaboration (4c) Baden-Württemberg - California State University" by Dr. Melanie Nagel (Institute of Political Science). It is funded by the Excellence Strategy "Environmental Systems" of the University of Tübingen and carried out in cooperation with scientists of the California State University in Long Beach. Two research assistants are employed in Tübingen and three in LongBeach. Due to the pandemic, this pilot study will be conducted online and is planned for one year (start February 2021). Teams of researchers in Long Beach and Tübingen will collect data in
Phase 1, collect data on local climate policy in the selected case cities (Mannheim, Karlsruhe, Long Beach, and Oakland) via local newspapers, creating a cross-national code-book and analyze these with a discourse network analysis. In Phase 2, local climate policy organizations identified as relevant will be investigated with a survey questionnaire. The research questions refer to questions like: Which actors are particularly important for a (more or less) successful climate policy? Which discourses that are supportive for local climate protection projects can be identified? What motivates actors to engage in climate protection projects? The research trip funded by the Ministry of Science and the Arts will be followed up at a later date and a research cooperation beyond this will be pursued.
Common public goods
- The political organization of infrastructure provision in the regulatory state
The research project "Common public goods. The political organization of infrastructure provision in the regulatory state" is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the funding line "Participation and Common Good" and is located at the Institute of Political Science at the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen.
We investigate how infrastructure tasks are politically conceived as public goods and how they are demanded from the guarantor state. We are interested in the extent to which the state sees itself as a guarantor state in the organization of services for the common good and is able to meet the expectations placed on it. We focus on selected fields of action:
- outpatient health care in rural areas
- the provision of urban housing
- ensuring "clean air".
In these fields of action, we want to determine more precisely what specific developments, problems and obstacles there are and how political decision-makers are reacting to them. In particular, we analyze the competing meanings and justifications for the state's offer of public goods. In addition, we examine the performance claims that civil society actors bring to the state. Among the competing discursive and programmatic conceptions, the positions of so-called "weak interest groups" are to be given special attention - from the perspective of participation.
Further information is available at https://www.infrastruktur-gewaehrleisten.de/ .