Zeitraum: 2024-2027
Verantwortlich: Hong Yu Wong; Claudio Tennie (Forschungsbereich für Urgeschichte und Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie (UFG))
Are there primitive actions – behaviour which is agentive, but which does not derive from the agent’s reasons? Tyler Burge (2009) and Helen Steward (2009a, 2012) have argued that certain examples of animal actions fall into this category. This question is of great significance for the philosophy of action, which has focused on how action is rational behaviour that derives from reason and reflection. The case of primitive agency is thus striking in challenging the core tenet of reasons being necessary for action.
The existence of primitive actions would thus require a reorientation of the philosophy of action – with implications for key questions, such as whether a theory of action that is equally applicable to human and non-human animal action is possible. In light of this, we urgently need a systematic analysis of primitive action that would address the question of what primitive action is – in light of existing accounts of animal agency from action theory, animal behaviour research, and evolutionary theory. With primitive agency in mind, we need to re-examine the foundations of action theory. Finally, we can draw on what we learn from primitive agency and apply this to understanding animal agency and artificial agency. This project proposes to study primitive agency systematically, to reflect on its significance for action theory more generally, and to explore applications of a theory of primitive agency.
Gefördert durch die DFG