University Library

Artificial Intelligence for Academic Research

There are many AI tools specifically designed for academic literature research. Here you find an overview of these tools as well as information on the subjects and use cases for which they are (not yet) suited.   

Further down below, you also find an overview of many other AI tools that can be useful for academic research.   

The University Library offers workshops, consultations, and self-study courses on "Literature Research with AI". In addition, there’s a self-study module on "Image Generation with AI" (in German) - we also offer consultations on this topic.  

Please note when using the tools listed here:  

Practically all of them are problematic with respect to data privacy.  Please do not enter any personal data of third parties and carefully consider to what extent you want to disclose your own data.  

Please do not upload any copyrighted documents to these tools.  

Please make sure that your use of these tools is in line with the examination regulations of your department.   

Literature Research with AI - Tools and Introduction

AI tools for academic literature research can be divided into "finders" and "connectors".   

"Finders" work in a similar way to library catalogues: you enter a keyword, a phrase or - even better with many tools - a complete question. The tool then shows you a list of results.  

"Connectors" are based on a publication that you have already found. You enter part of this publication’s metadata (preferably the DOI) into the tool in order to find related literature.  

"Finders" that, in our experience, already deliver quite good results are 

Consensus  

  

offers quite many filters, summarizes publications, etc. 

Elicit  

  

 offers quite many filters, summarizes publications, etc. 

Keenious  

  

you upload a document you’re currently working on, and the tool suggests publications that match its topic 

  

SciSpace  

  

has access to a larger database; hence it works better than other tools when searching, for example, for monographs  

Semantic Scholar  

  

completely free, registration not necessary 

  

Undermind  

  

usually delivers the best (i.e. most relevant) lists of results among all the tools we’ve tested. 

 

"Connectors" that (in our experience) already deliver good results, are  

 

You can find more information on the tools mentioned  here, in our workshops and consultations and in our self-study course.  

At the moment, the "Finders" are mainly suitable for research in the natural sciences and medicine, less so for the humanities and social sciences. These tools mostly find journal articles (i.e. not monographs) in English - especially if they have a DOI and have been published Open Access. If these criteria usually apply to the literature in your subject area, the "Finders" should be able to provide you with rather good results.  

For the humanities and social sciences, we recommend trying out the "Connectors". 

Please also note: Chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot, Anthropic's ClaudeAI, Mistral's Le Chat etc. are currently not yet suitable for literature research, as they mainly provide hallucinated (i.e. invented) literature references in response to queries of this kind.  

Furthermore, in our experience, Perplexity AI is currently only suitable for searching for 'everyday information', but not for scientific research. 

AI Tools for Academic Research and Writing in General

Download the overview here

This list is updated regularly. If you discover a useful tool that is not yet on the list, please contact us at informationspam prevention@ub.uni-tuebingen.de

Workshops on Literature Research with AI 

Workshops on Literature Research with AI 

On request, we are also happy to offer additional workshops (in German or English) for groups of five or more participants. If you are interested in this offer, just contact us at informationspam prevention@ub.uni-tuebingen.de