Recently, we started to investigate different input devices and their suceptibility to interference and distraction. One example concern gestures used to interact with a computer or entertainment devices. In the right example, an up- or down-swiping gesture is used to move the screen content up or down. Currently, the preferred gesture-content-movement combination is investigated in our lab (Janczyk, Xiong, & Proctor, accepted/in press). Other work (e.g., Janczyk, Pfister, & Kunde, 2013) is concerned with the susceptibility of mouse-movements to distraction by irrelevant variations of target items. Further, our research on multitasking in general concerns human factors research, since we are also investigating how multitasking costs can be reduced and performance be facilitated. For more information on this, please see here, here, or here.
Recent publications:
Janczyk, M., Xiong, A., & Proctor, R.W. (accepted/in press). Stimulus-response and response-effect compatibility with touchless gestures and moving action effects. Human Factors.
Janczyk, M., Yamaguchi, M., Proctor, R.W., Pfister, R. (2015). Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 930-940.
Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Mice move smoothly: Irrelevant object variation affects perception, but not computer-mouse actions. Experimental Brain Research, 231, 97-106.
Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Crognale, M., & Kunde, W. (2012). Effective rotations: Action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 489-501
Janczyk, M., Pfister, R. & Kunde, W. (2012). On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. Journal of Psychology, 220, 16-22.
Kunde, W., Pfister, R. & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 703-714.